Coverage › CVE-2023-22952
CVE-2023-22952 Stale Partial Sigma
Multiple SugarCRM Products Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
- Vendor / product
- SugarCRM — Multiple Products
- Description (CISA)
- Multiple SugarCRM products contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the EmailTemplates. Using a specially crafted request, custom PHP code can be injected through the EmailTemplates.
- Added to KEV
- 2023-02-02
- Due date
- 2023-02-23
- Required action
- Apply updates per vendor instructions.
- Known ransomware use
- Unknown
- CWE
- CWE-20
- CISA notes
- https://support.sugarcrm.com/Resources/Security/sugarcrm-sa-2023-001/
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22952 - Elsewhere
- cve.org · NVD · CISA KEV · JSON
Stale mapping. This entry was mapped under ATT&CK 16.1; the current bundle is v19.2, and at least one mapped technique no longer stands as mapped:
- T1562.001 was revoked (superseded by T1685)
The chain below is rendered for the techniques that are still live. The superseding technique is linked where ATT&CK records one, but kevmap does not transfer the mapping to it — that would be a new claim nobody has published.
ATT&CK techniques · CTID Mappings Explorer, ATT&CK 16.1, KEV snapshot 2025-07-28
10 mapping objects across 10 techniques. exploitation technique states how the vulnerability is exploited; primary and secondary impact state what exploitation achieves. They are different claims and are labelled as such.
| Technique | Mapping type | CTID comment | Status in v19.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application | exploitation technique | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1021.001 Remote Desktop Protocol | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter | primary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1070.004 File Deletion | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1078 Valid Accounts | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1083 File and Directory Discovery | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1482 Domain Trust Discovery | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1505.003 Web Shell | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1530 Data from Cloud Storage | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
live |
| T1562.001 Disable or Modify Tools | secondary impact | This Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is exploited by an unauthenticated attacker via a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation.
This vulnerability has been exploited by threat actors to gain initial access to AWS accounts by injecting custom PHP code through the SugarCRM email templates module. Attackers leveraged misconfigurations to expand their access, obtaining long-term AWS access keys from compromised EC2 instances. They used tools like Pacu and Scout Suite to explore AWS services such as EC2, IAM, RDS, and S3, and gathered account information via AWS Organizations and Cost and Usage services. The attackers moved laterally by creating RDS snapshots and new EC2 instances, modifying security groups, and attempting to escalate privileges by logging in as the Root user. They also employed defense evasion techniques, including deploying resources in non-standard regions and intermittently stopping EC2 instances to avoid detection and minimize costs.
The exploit in question is actively being used to compromise hosts by installing a PHP-based web shell. It involves an authentication bypass against the "/index.php" endpoint of the targeted service. Once bypassed, the attacker obtains a cookie and sends a secondary POST request to "/cache/images/sweet.phar" to upload a small PNG-encoded file containing PHP code. This file acts as a web shell, allowing the execution of commands specified in the base64-encoded query argument "c". For example, a request like 'POST /cache/images/sweet.phar?c="L2Jpbi9pZA=="' would execute the command "/bin/id" with the same permissions as the web service's user. ref 1 · ref 2 · ref 3 |
revoked → T1685 |
Detection chain · ATT&CK Enterprise v19.2 detection strategies, analytics, log sources
T1021.001 Remote Desktop Protocol secondary impact
- DET0327 Multi-event Detection Strategy for RDP-Based Remote Logins and Post-Access Activity
AN0931 WindowsRemote Desktop (RDP) logon by a user followed by unusual process execution, file access, or lateral movement activity within a short timeframe.Tunable:
TimeWindowUserContextProcessListHostAccessPatterns
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1021.001 (16)
All 16 rules on the technique page →
T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter primary impact
- DET0516 Behavioral Detection of Command and Scripting Interpreter Abuse
AN1428 WindowsDetects the execution of scripting or command interpreters (e.g., powershell.exe, cmd.exe, wscript.exe) outside expected administrative time windows or from abnormal user contexts, often followed by encoded/obfuscated arguments or secondary execution events.Tunable:
CommandLinePatternParentProcessNameTimeWindowAN1429 LinuxDetects use of shell interpreters (e.g., bash, sh, python, perl) initiated by users or processes not normally executing them, especially when chaining suspicious utilities like netcat, curl, or ssh.Tunable:InterpreterNameUserContextExecutionChainLengthAN1430 macOSDetects launch of command-line interpreters via Terminal, Automator, or hiddenosascript, especially when parent process lineage deviates from user-initiated applications.macos:unifiedloglog stream --info --predicate 'eventMessage CONTAINS "exec"'→ DC0032 Process CreationTunable:LaunchAgentNameScriptNameTerminalAppUsageAN1431 ESXiDetects use of 'esxcli system' or direct interpreter commands (e.g., busybox shell) invoked from SSH or host terminal unexpectedly.Tunable:ShellEnabledFlagSSHContextAN1432 Network DevicesIdentifies CLI interpreter access (e.g., Cisco IOS, Juniper JUNOS) viaenablemode or scripting-capable sessions used by uncommon accounts or from unknown IPs.Tunable:UserRoleDeviceType
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1059 (95)
All 95 rules on the technique page →
T1070.004 File Deletion secondary impact
- DET0140 Behavioral Detection of Malicious File Deletion
AN0392 WindowsDetects adversary behavior deleting artifacts (e.g., dropped payloads, evidence files) using native or external utilities (e.g., del, erase, SDelete). Detects deletion events correlated with unusual process lineage or timing post-execution.Tunable:
TimeWindowFilePathPatternUserContextAN0393 LinuxDetects deletion of suspicious files (e.g., payloads, temp exes, scripts) viarm,unlink, or secure deletion tools likeshred, especially when performed by unexpected users or shortly after execution.Tunable:PathRegexTimeWindowSecureDeletionToolAN0394 macOSDetects removal of adversary artifacts viarm,unlink, or secure tools, with focus on shell sessions, temp files, and modified LaunchAgents or system directories.Tunable:FilePathRegexToolUsageAnomalyAN0395 ESXiDetects manual or scripted removal of logs, artifacts, or malware droppings viarmor PowerCLI in ESXi shell. Focus on deletions from /tmp/, /var/core/, or /scratch.Tunable:LogFilePathTimeWindow
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1070.004 (15)
T1078 Valid Accounts secondary impact
- DET0560 Detection of Valid Account Abuse Across Platforms
AN1543 WindowsDetection of compromised or misused valid accounts via anomalous logon patterns, abnormal logon types, and inconsistent geographic or time-based activity across Windows endpoints.Tunable:
LogonTypeTimeWindowGeoIPMismatchAN1544 LinuxDetection of valid account misuse through SSH logins, sudo/su abuse, and service account anomalies outside expected patterns.Tunable:UserContextHostDensityThresholdLoginMethodAN1545 macOSDetection of interactive and remote logins by service accounts or users at unusual times, with unexpected child process activity.Tunable:LoginOriginProcessTreeDepthAN1546 Identity ProviderDetection of valid account abuse in IdP logs via geographic anomalies, impossible travel, risky sign-ins, and multiple MFA attempts or failures.Tunable:MFAFailureCountRiskScoreThresholdIPGeoVelocityAN1547 ContainersDetection of containerized service accounts or compromised kubeconfigs being used for cluster access from unexpected nodes or IPs.Tunable:ServiceAccountScopeClusterIPWhitelist
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1078 (56)
All 56 rules on the technique page →
T1083 File and Directory Discovery secondary impact
- DET0370 Recursive Enumeration of Files and Directories Across Privilege Contexts
AN1040 WindowsExecution of file enumeration commands (e.g., 'dir', 'tree') from non-standard processes or unusual user contexts, followed by recursive directory traversal or access to sensitive locations.Tunable:
CommandLineRegexUserContextTimeWindowAN1041 LinuxUse of file enumeration commands (e.g., 'ls', 'find', 'locate') executed by suspicious users or scripts accessing broad file hierarchies or restricted directories.Tunable:FilePathDepthUserContextAN1042 macOSExecution of file or directory discovery commands (e.g., 'ls', 'find') from terminal or script-based tooling, especially outside normal user workflows.Tunable:PredicateScopeTimeWindowAN1043 ESXiExecution of esxcli commands to enumerate datastore, configuration files, or directory structures by unauthorized or remote users.Tunable:CLICommandPatternAccessSourceAN1044 Network DevicesExecution of file discovery commands (e.g., 'dir', 'show flash', 'nvram:') from CLI interfaces, especially by unauthorized users or from abnormal source IPs.Tunable:CommandWhitelistSessionOrigin
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1083 (24)
All 24 rules on the technique page →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application exploitation technique
- DET0080 Exploit Public-Facing Application – multi-signal correlation (request → error → post-exploit process/egress)
AN0219 WindowsAdversary sends crafted HTTP/S (or other service) input to an Internet-facing app (IIS/ASP.NET, API, device portal). Chain: (1) abnormal request patterns to public endpoint → (2) elevated 4xx/5xx or unusual methods/paths → (3) server process (w3wp.exe/other service) spawns shell/LOLbins or loads non-standard modules → (4) optional outbound callback from the host/container.ApplicationLog:IIS
IIS W3C logs in C:\inetpub\logs\LogFiles\W3SVC* (spikes in 5xx, RCE/SQLi/path traversal/JNDI patterns)→ DC0038 Application Log ContentTunable:PublicVIPsSuspiciousPatternsErrorRateThresholdTimeWindowAllowedChildListAN0220 LinuxAdversary exploits Apache/Nginx/app servers. Chain: (1) suspicious requests in access logs → (2) spike of 5xx or WAF blocks → (3) web server or interpreter (apache2/nginx/php-fpm/node/python) spawns /bin/sh, curl, wget, socat, or writes webshell → (4) outbound callback.ApplicationLog:WebServer/var/log/httpd/access_log, /var/log/apache2/access.log, /var/log/nginx/access.log with exploit indicators and burst errors→ DC0038 Application Log ContentNSM:FlowHTTP payloads with SQLi/LFI/JNDI/deserialization indicators→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:WebProcListChildToolListBurstThresholdTimeWindowAN0221 macOSAdversary targets macOS-hosted public services (e.g., nginx, node). Chain: suspicious inbound request → service crash/5xx → service spawns shell or writes file → new outbound connection.macos:unifiedlogApp/web server logs ingested via unified logging or filebeat (nginx/apache/node).→ DC0038 Application Log ContentTunable:ServiceListTimeWindowAN0222 ContainersAdversary exploits containerized app via ingress or service. Chain: (1) suspicious request in ingress/app logs → (2) container process spawns a shell/exec/sidecar (kubectl exec/docker exec) → (3) egress to Internet or metadata service (169.254.169.254).ApplicationLog:IngressKubernetes NGINX/Envoy ingress controller logs with anomalous payloads and 5xx spikes→ DC0038 Application Log Contentdocker:eventsDocker/Kubernetes audit of exec/attach (kubectl exec) or unexpected child processes inside container→ DC0032 Process CreationNSM:FlowRequests towards cloud metadata or command & control from pod IPs→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:IngressNamespacesMetadataEndpointsTimeWindowAN0223 IaaSAdversary targets cloud-hosted public endpoints. Chain: (1) ALB/ELB/Cloud LB logs show exploit-like inputs or error spikes → (2) workload spawns shell or reaches metadata API → (3) egress to new external hosts.ALB:HTTPLogsAWS ALB/ELB/GCP/Azure Application Gateway HTTP logs with unusual methods, long URIs, serialized payloads, 4xx/5xx bursts→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentAWS:VPCFlowLogsVPC/NSG flow logs for pod/instance egress to Internet or metadata→ DC0078 Network Traffic FlowTunable:LBProjectsErrorBurstAN0224 ESXiAdversary exploits exposed OpenSLP on ESXi or vCenter public endpoints. Chain: inbound request pattern to mgmt service → hostd/vpxd error/crash/restart → unexpected process behavior or datastore access → outbound callback.esxi:hostd/var/log/hostd.log anomalies (faults, crashes, restarts) around inbound connections→ DC0038 Application Log ContentNSM:FlowConnections to TCP 427 (SLP) or vCenter web services from untrusted sources→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:MgmtCIDRTimeWindowAN0225 Network DevicesAdversary exploits public admin services on routers/firewalls/switches. Chain: anomalous HTTP/SNMP/SmartInstall inputs → device syslog errors/restarts → config changes/CLI spawn → egress to attacker C2.networkdevice:controlplaneSyslog from edge devices with HTTP 500s on mgmt portal, SmartInstall events, unexpected CLI commands→ DC0038 Application Log ContentTunable:MgmtPortsTrustedAdmins
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1190 (149)
All 149 rules on the technique page →
T1482 Domain Trust Discovery secondary impact
- DET0007 Detection of Domain Trust Discovery via API, Script, and CLI Enumeration
AN0016 WindowsAdversary uses nltest, PowerShell, or Win32/.NET API to enumerate domain trust relationships (via DSEnumerateDomainTrusts, GetAllTrustRelationships, or LDAP queries), followed by discovery or authentication staging.Tunable:
ParentImageTimeWindowUserContextAPI_Name
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1482 (17)
All 17 rules on the technique page →
T1505.003 Web Shell secondary impact
- DET0394 Web Shell Detection via Server Behavior and File Execution Chains
AN1108 WindowsUnexpected file creation in web directories followed by web server processes (e.g., w3wp.exe) spawning command shells or script interpreters (e.g., cmd.exe, powershell.exe)NSM:Flow
Inbound HTTP POST with suspicious payload size or user-agent→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:WebRootPathParentProcessAN1109 LinuxFile creation of unauthorized script (e.g., .php, .sh) in /var/www/html followed by execution of unexpected system utilities (e.g., curl, bash, nc) by apache/nginxauditd:SYSCALLnew file created in /var/www/html, /srv/http, or similar web root→ DC0039 File CreationNSM:FlowPOST requests to .php, .jsp, .aspx files with high entropy body→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:WebRootPathPayloadEntropyThresholdTimeWindowAN1110 macOSWeb servers (e.g., httpd) spawning abnormal processes post file upload into /Library/WebServer/Documents or /usr/local/var/wwwTunable:InterpreterNameExecutionParent
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1505.003 (35)
All 35 rules on the technique page →
T1530 Data from Cloud Storage secondary impact
- DET0484 Multi-Platform Cloud Storage Exfiltration Behavior Chain
AN1328 IaaSSpike in object access from new IAM user or role followed by data exfiltration to external IPsAWS:VPCFlowLogs
Unusual volume of data transferred from S3 storage endpoints to non-corporate IPs→ DC0085 Network Traffic ContentTunable:TimeWindowExternalIPAllowListAN1329 SaaSOAuth token granted to external app followed by download of high-volume files in OneDrive/Google DriveTunable:AppRegistrationNamePatternDownloadThresholdMBAN1330 Office SuiteInternal user account accesses shared links outside org followed by mass file downloadTunable:LinkVisibilityScopeDownloadBurstThreshold
Sigma rules tagged attack.t1530 (0)
None. MITRE's strategy above is the only public detection guidance for this technique.